Hello,
When I request daily reductions (e.g. sum) of some variables – total_precipitation
for instance – I do not find the same values as when I download the 24 hourly variables and sum them on my side.
I’m using "time_zone": "utc+00:00"
to compare against the standard hourly variables in UTC.
What I don’t understand is that despite passing "time_zone": "utc+00:00"
, I see these lines printed in my terminal when I launch the request:
2024-12-04 17:50:34,236 INFO Request ID is f16deaaa-78d4-43c9-bb0b-d2dc255085fb
2024-12-04 17:50:34,298 INFO status has been updated to accepted
2024-12-04 17:50:39,311 INFO status has been updated to running
2024-12-04 17:51:07,022 INFO Daily reduction: sum {'time_shift': {'hours': -1}, 'remove_partial_periods': True}
If I change my request to pass "time_zone": "utc+01:00"
instead of "utc+00:00"
, I get the following printed in my terminal:
2024-12-04 18:03:45,987 INFO Request ID is e58b5d61-75eb-4424-ab75-06d33878ff48
2024-12-04 18:03:46,748 INFO status has been updated to accepted
2024-12-04 18:04:08,743 INFO Daily reduction: sum {'time_shift': {'hours': 0}, 'remove_partial_periods': True}
2024-12-04 18:04:08,743 INFO status has been updated to running
The values match exactly what I have if I sum the hourly variables on my side.
If this behaviour was consistent I would adapt my requests, but if I request a different variable (e.g. u10
) with "time_zone": "utc+00:00"
I see the following printed in my terminal:
2024-12-04 18:16:58,687 INFO Request ID is d64770f4-036c-482d-8a86-b5e082dbec48
2024-12-04 18:16:58,727 INFO status has been updated to accepted
2024-12-04 18:17:03,762 INFO status has been updated to running
2024-12-04 18:17:07,345 INFO Daily reduction: mean {'time_shift': {'hours': 0}, 'remove_partial_periods': True}
And the values match precisely what I get when I reduce the hourly variables.
Is this behavior expected? Is there something special about some variables that "time_zone": "utc+00:00"
leads to a time shift of -1 while other variables lead to a time shift of zero?
Many thanks for any reply on this topic, even if it is to acknowledge that you are looking into it